Skip to main content

Week 11 Analysis: Racism


            Eldridge Cleaver was born in Wabbaseka, Arkansas in 1935, at the age of 22 he was imprisoned due to assault. During his time inside the prison cell, he began to study the works of Karl Marx and Richard Wright, the work of Cleaver became influential even after he died in 1998. Cleaver also became a part of the Black Panther Party which aims to merge black nationalism and socialism. However, in 1960 racism and prejudice is common in California which mostly affects the black people. Cleaver was then again taken into custody by the police and revoked his parole due because there has been an attacked to the Black Panther Party in which the police targeted this group. During his stay in the prison, he wrote the Eldridge Cleaver: Post-Prison Writings and Speeches which includes Affidavit #2: Shoot-Out in Oakland.
            Affidavit #2: Shoot-Out in Oakland is a story in which it shows the racism and prejudice that a black-American experience during that time. This story is connected to what happens to the Black Panther Party which results in deaths of some members and the recapturing of Cleaver which is unjust. In addition to this, this story has shown how police officers that time looks on people with dark skin, they treat them like criminals and capture them without any warrant of arrest. The story of Cleaver has shown how the life of black-American was, during the time where people look at people with dark skin as different and slaves.
            As we all know, America has built with the help of African in which they are used as slaves in farms and other fields of business in order to gain profit and built this great country. However, as time passed by, they gain their freedom but they were treated the same by the white people.

Labels:

Comments

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

Reading Notes W15: Daniel Orozco, Part A

            The story of Daniel Orozco “Orientation” is a short story which focuses on the idea of the orientation of a person on his first day at work. Orozco does not introduce the narrator of the story, also, as the story continues it shows the life of the employees and how they interact became the important part of the story. The story is told in the first person voice. The narrator is talking to one particular person; He refers to this character in the second person voice. “This is your phone.” The narrator is talking directly to the new employee, the main character. The main character never speaks. It is implied that dialogue exists. “That was a good question. Feel free to ask questions.” The narrator has acknowledged that the listener has asked a question. The reader never actually sees the question that the listener asks, though. Instead, the narrator rephrases the listener’s question and repeats it back to him. By having the narrator do this, Orozco makes the listener le
Post a Comment
Read more

Week 4 Analysis: The Hunt for Revenge

Samuel McDuffie Literary Analysis The Hunt for Revenge John Rollin Ridge (Yellow Bird) was born in 1827 into a distinguished Cherokee family in Georgia.  His father, John Ridge and grandfather Major Ridge were prosperous farmer and slaveholders.  Both grandfather and father were influential leaders in the dispute over how to respond to pressure from the United States to give up Cherokee Lands and move west.  He was the first Indian to publish a novel. In his work  The Life and Adventures of Joaquin Murieta, the Celebrated California Bandit  is a  contemporary account of California as it was settling. In the reading assigned, the reader is introduced to lawless men in California, known as bandits, and Joaquin Murieta. Joaquin Murieta is a Mexican-American bandit, who leaves behind a legacy of morals and bravery.  The Life and Adventures of Joaquin Murieta, tells the story of the Joaquin in the Gold-rush era, wanting to find fortune and happiness; however, it turns chaotic when hi
4 comments
Read more

Reading Notes W17: Gonzalez, Part A

Rigoberto Gonzalez Casa A poem which depicts the idea of a house who has its own thought, the poem could be considered as a fable because the main character of the poem is a house. An object which does not have the capability to talk or think. The idea of this poem is that the house could be someone or something that a person could talk to but do not have the capability to answer back. I think the poem shows the emotion of the author with regards to a home in which there are numerous occasions, events, either sad or happy occurred inside it. It shows that the house, holds numerous memories.
Post a Comment
Read more